Still Life Object
My idea for the Object project is fragmented identity in feminist point
of view. At first I wanted to take photographs of dolls or faces, but after
doing my research on fragmentation I decided I wanted to use a mask made of
bits of a broken mirror as my object. This way the object would be gender
neutral, which is what I want my statement as a fragmented identity to stand
for; the fragmentation of identity is not only within female or men, but within
everyone, regardless of their sex.
Because at first my interest was in the gaze of women my research was
set more on artists such as Laurel Nakadate and Simone Beauvoir, but after I
shifted from that idea to a more universal one, I did a little more research
and this time about identity by reading article on exhibition "Idenity:
Eight rooms nine lives". The exhibition is made of eight rooms where each
of the rooms focus on an individual or individuals whose lives or achievements
have influenced our thinking about identity. The idea of putting identities
into different rooms, these boxes, was very interesting and in a way something
what I had been thinking about with the fragmentation. But then in my opinion
if one puts something into a box it always has a negative connotation;
something that is there will be there, and that won't change. When thinking
about identity as fragmented and ever changing, these pieces in the boxes
together create this kind of fragmentation that I want to speak about. That is
what I did with my bits of a broken mirror; the mirror that shows the face and
the soul, yet is always distorted and not what someone else looking at the
person sees in the person that is looked at. Because the mirror is on the face
it's always untouchable to the person who has this mirror skin; everything the
person sees, he/she is - the face of a person is always a reflection of others.
For my visual reference I wanted to shoot the face as distorted as
possible using a shallow depth of field. My first photograph with a large
format camera was more abstract than the second one, but because the second one
had more interesting focus point I decided to use that one. I wanted to make my
idea as personal yet universal as possible and not to think about other
artists' still-life photographs. I feel that my object speaks about the issue
of fragmented identity because of usage of a broken mirror to which everyone
can relate to. It does not look appealing, but strange and slightly
frightening.
Body
My initial idea for the portrait was to capture a person in his/her
moment in thought – not a pose for
the camera/photographer/painter, but a secret or not so secret moment in
his/her mind in the shape of his/her body, posture and face that in one way or
another shows an emotion of that thought that they're in. Even though what I
wanted to photograph is the complete opposite of someone posing, acting an
emotion, I am using one of my research as film – in particular Bela Tarr's Kárhozat. Its dramatic
despair gives a secret yet open view to human feelings and behavior, which I am
interested in; to document in the means of making art.
As my photographic research I have been advised to look artists such as
Sarah Jones, Helen Van Meene and Alex Soth because of their work has the notion
of a photographer/camera not being there, the person photographed not posing
but being themselves in their moments.
I am fond of the sort of nothingness that turns into everything one can
experience in these photographs; something that that is silent yet screaming at
the same moment, the moment of accident; the photographer shouldn't be there,
yet they have been given this opportunity to come in and have these intimate
moments with the people in the photographs.
In terms of aesthetics I'm interested in photographer Paolo Roversi's
work especially his series Nudi, contemporary painter Hayley Quentin's
work, and George Richmond's drawings from the 19th century.
What I want my represent is something very physical, very emotional and
heavy into something light and transparent, almost as thin as air. I'm
interested in the lightness and the single moment, thought, the softness of the
simple being on its own harshness.
As my model I wanted someone with the quality of grace and lightness,
and therefore wanted to use a model from Scandinavia or Asia. I ended up in
asking a Norwegian girl Tine from the 3rd year photography
department because of her light skin and hair, and joyful appearance.
I find my result of this portrait to be in its way successful: it
depicts the quality of a drawing while the person (Tine) in the portrait is in
her own thoughts, in her own world. I tried taking the photograph in a moment
when she had forgotten the whole situation of being portrayed, and in some way
I find the photograph capturing that. But as I was photographing her I didn’t
feel I could relax her into a state of feeling her being completely alone:
something that I want to learn to do in the future.
Self evaluation
I feel my research for the Environment unit could have been more specialized compared to the research I did for the Object and Body unit. Nevertheless I feel strongly that my ideas come through in my visual work. I’m not sure to which context would I place my work in.
I have
managed my
studies well and met the deadlines for shooting and printing in time.
Shoot
production wisely
I don’t yet feel comfortable working in studio, which means I need to
use more
time in the studio to feel more confident of working in that
environment. I enjoy working with
no
limitation in the creative process, using any kind of approach and
coming up with any kind of result of the concept behind work is
interesting, which is why I at times found it hard to
work exactly what I wanted on the Object and Body unit. I also found the
pastiches really hard to work on due their lack of any creativity, which
took
my interest level quite low, which then reflected upon the final result
of the
work and my work ethics of that project. In the future I will try to
work more
open minded with such tasks, because I do understand the reason why are
we to
make such work; to understand technical aspects of photography.
I feel my research for the Environment unit could have been more specialized compared to the research I did for the Object and Body unit. Nevertheless I feel strongly that my ideas come through in my visual work. I’m not sure to which context would I place my work in.
I am quite particular
with my visual choices, how am I to photograph something and in what way
am to
make the final print of it. Both of the environment series depicts this:
my
usage of round shape and transparent figure for the landscape series
speaks
about the other worldly, dead people from the past, whereas in the city
series
I embraced the film still quality by making the print as a size of a
film still
in a large canvas while using the regular sized paper. In the object
work my
visual approach was not much mostly cause I am not familiar with
shooting objects.
The portrait’s usage of drawing like quality was necessary while
capturing the
essence of a moment in a thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment